Geant4 simulation of neutron cross section of 208Pb, 90Zr, 40Ca
Xinjie Qiu
April 3, 2006
In the motivation of testing the physics list of Geant4 applicable to our simulation purpose, we compared the simulation result with the experimental cross section data of neutron interacting with 208Pb, 90Zr, 40Ca.
1. Geometry and Setup
A simple geometry of 24cm x 24cm x 24cm lead (and also Zirconium, Calcium) cube (see right figure, but ignore the blue dots inside the cube)is used in the simulation, with neutron beam at different energy shooting from the top to the center of the sample. It is the same geometry used in last notes, which compared the FLUKA simulation results with Geant4 results.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
2. Cross Section Calculation from the Simulation Data
For each energy, five different runs with different random seeds are simulated. Each beam has 1000 incident neutron with the same energy. Beam energies are from 10 to 500 MeV, with 2 MeV spacing for energy lower than 100MeV, and 20 MeV for energy above 100 MeV. Neutron kinetic energy, momentum, position are recorded in files during simulations for later analysis, when they come out of the cube and hit on an imaginary sphere surface just a little bit bigger than the cube.
The number of non-interaction neutrons in each run is determined by counting the outgoing neutrons without losing any kinetic energy, and the trajectory is a straight line.
The cross sections can be calculated from the familiar relationship,
1 σ = - ----- ln T n L
Where T is the transmission(number of non-interacting neutrons over total number of neutrons) of the sample , n is the number desity of atoms, L is the interaction length( L = 24cm in this case).
3. Physics List
Physics list LHEP_BIC_HP is chosen to be used in the simulation.
4. Results
The simulation results of the cross section agree satisfactory with the experiment data, except that,
1. there are "dips" at 20 MeV for 208Pb and 90Zr, which might due to the swith of physics list model(HP and BIC)at that region, and that confused the program which model to choose.
2. Discontinuities between 32 MeV and 34 MeV for 90Zr and 40Ca, I don't know the reason yet.
3. Second peak at about ~80 MeV for 208Pb is higher than the experimental data, don't know reason either.
2 and 3 are at the BIC model effective region, which is expected to give more precise results, but turns out not true for our simulation.
I don't need worry too much about it as far as my simulation work is concerned, since my next step on the simulation is the neutron calibration, and 252Cf emited neutron peaks at ~1.5 MeV, which HP model describes pretty well for neutron-Pb cross section.
| Geant4 Simulation result | Experiment Result(2) |
|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
5. Summary
Simulation result of the cross section of neutron with 208Pb, 90Zr, 40Ca are compared with experiment data, Agreements are found in most of the regions between 10 MeV to 500 MeV, except at some energy ranges. Other physics list will be tested.
6. Reference
1. A paper comparing physics simulations at the LHC between several geant4 physics models and fluka.
2. Neutron cross section on Pb from 10-500 MeV.
7. Future plan
As in the background meeting notes, my future working task will be,